Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of an employer's false explanation for employment action supported the jury's finding of unlawful pretext
• “Actions taken by an employer that disadvantage an employee for no logical reason constitute strong evidence of intent to discriminate.”
• “If defendants felt an expert witness would have helped clarify the charts, they could have called such a person to testify.”
• “Actions taken by an employer that disadvantage an employee for no logical reason constitute strong evidence of an intent to discriminate.”
• “Actions taken by an employer that disadvantage an employee for no logical reason constitute strong evidence of an intent to discriminate.”
• “Actions taken by an employer that disadvantage an employee for no logical reason constitute strong evidence of an intent to discriminate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).