Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “constructive discharge cannot form the basis for quid pro quo sexual harassment”
• explaining that an act is not necessarily committed under color of state law simply because it is committed by an on-duty state employee
• distinguishing discrete acts of quid pro quo harassment from acts aggregated to make out a hostile environment claim
• denying summary judgment in favor of an employer when evidence indicated that the employer took no action whatsoever for three months
• holding police department and municipality same for § 1983
• supplying constructive discharge alone is insufficient to establish a quid pro quo harassment claim where there is no evidence of a forced resignation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).