Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs failed to show that residency requirement for municipal employees, independent of other factors that may affect the racial balance of the workforce, was causally related to racial disparity
• upholding finding that the plaintiff did not prove that residency requirement caused disparate impact — statistical evidence was not strong, and city showed that its four-year moratorium on the residency requirement did not raise the number of Black employees
• \[Clearly erroneous] review is more deferential with respect to determinations about the credibility of witnesses . . . .\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).