Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff H.'s harassers were motivated in part by his failure to conform to stereotypical male standards
• noting that plaintiff H.’s harassers were motivated in part by his failure to conform to stereotypical male standards
• finding that a worker who wore an earring and was habitually called “fag” or “queer” made a sufficient allegation of gender-based discrimination to defeat a motion for summary judgment
• “Just as in Price Waterhouse, then, gender stereotyping establishes the link to the plaintiffs sex that Title VII requires.”
• “[w]e have never made the viability of sexual harassment claims dependent upon the sexual orientation of the harasser, and we are convinced that it would be both unwise and improper to begin doing so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).