Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding evidence of pretext where the plaintiff presented evidence of discrepancies in how the candidates were evaluated based on the criteria identified by the defendant as relevant in its decision-making process
• finding discrepancies in the timing of employee evaluations, priority given to factors in ranking candidates, and interpretation of occupational grade levels, all of which were identified as reasons for not promoting plaintiff
• outlining prima facie case for failure to. promote plaintiff as requiring plaintiff to show that he: (1) belongs to a protected category; (2) applied for and was qualified for a job in an available position; (3) was rejected; and (4
• \we must determine whether the totality of the evidence would allow a reasonable factfinder to conclude\ that bias has been established
• “there is no testimony to support either conjecture, and, even if there were, it would be up to a jury to reconcile the conflicting testimony surrounding [plaintiffs] interview and the ranking of candidates.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).