Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding retaliation in employer’s lack of response to and acquiescence in co-workers’ campaign of harassment and rumor-mongering
• “No one would question the retaliatory effect of many actions that put the complainant in a more unfriendly working environment.”
• “It is well established that an employer can be held liable under Title VII for … harassment by an employee’s co-workers if the employer had actual or constructive knowledge of the harassment and failed to address the problem adequately.”
• “We agree ... that the State’s trial objection was not specific enough to alert the district court to the more refined argument it is now making [on appeal], and thus that the objection did not meet the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 51.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).