Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that after-acquired evidence is inadmissible where it presents a “different and legitimate reason for discharge”
• noting that the familiar McDonnell-Douglas burden shifting dichotomy applies to retaliation claims
• relied on by von Gunten

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).