Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff made a sufficient showing of pretext, because individuals with input into her termination decision directed arguably gender-biased remarks at her
• suggesting that remark must be made by someone with role in the decisional process
• characterizing as indirect evidence a supervisor's comments that a plaintiff could be expected to lack motivation because of her husband's income and another plaintiff would have marital problems because her husband would be uncomfortable earning less than her
• relying on the “context of the case” in considering the plaintiff’s pretext evidence
• plaintiff could show pretext in part because employer gave inconsistent - 28 - explanations of criteria used in evaluating plaintiff’s performance
• “The remarks at issue in this case were directed to the plaintiffs individually, unlike the very general statements in Cone.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).