Skip to main content
· 11/27/2006

7-Eleven, Inc. v. Bowens

Citations

  • 857 N.E.2d 382
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 2424
  • 2006 WL 3392735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expert testimony is not required in toxic tort cases if the specific cause of the plaintiff's illness is obvious
  • “Although these concerns [of individual issues] may be legitimate, we cannot conclude that they outweigh the economies of time, effort, and expense that will be achieved by allowing the class action to proceed on the issues defined by the trial court.”
  • “Although these concerns [of individual issues] may be legitimate, we cannot conclude that they outweigh the economies of time, effort, and expense that will be achieved by allowing the class action to proceed on the issues defined by the trial court.”
  • “Although these concerns [of individual issues] may be legitimate, we cannot conclude that they outweigh the economies of time, effort, and expense that will be achieved by allowing the class action to proceed on the issues defined by the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Friedlander, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.