65 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 824, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,272 Milton Woroski v. Nashua Corporation, Albert Skawinski v. Nashua Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “some evidence is not sufficient to withstand a properly supported motion for summary judgment”
• granting summary judgment in age discrimination case despite comments by employers that older employees lack an aggressive and competitive disposition
• employer proffered legitimate reason where employer had determined that remaining employees “also 40 or older” were “more senior” and “capable”
• while plaintiff did advance some evidence of age bias, court found that “some evidence is not sufficient to withstand a properly supported motion for summary judgment”
• “A plaintiff is not required to show that he was replaced by a younger, newly-hired employee”
• to defeat summary judgment, plaintiff must show issue of fact concerning whether employer’s asserted reason for termination is false and that more likely than not, discrimination was the real reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).