Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the employer subjected the employee to a “constant barrage” of abusive behavior, “all of which occurred soon after plaintiffs initial complaints and continued until his discharge”
• finding that the employer subjected the employee to a “constant barrage” of abusive behavior, “all of which occurred soon after plaintiff's initial complaints and continued until his discharge”
• providing that a “constant barrage of written and verbal warnings . . . , inaccurate point totalings, and disciplinary action, all of which occurred soon after plaintiff’s initial complaints and continued until his discharge” can support causation
• finding a pattern of antagonism where the intervening animus began “soon after plaintiff’s initial complaints and continued until his discharge.”
• finding a court could reasonably infer a causal connection between protected activity and retaliation despite a two-year gap because of an intervening pattern of antagonism

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).