Skip to main content
· 10/19/1973

614 COMPANY v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 211 N.W.2d 891
  • 297 Minn. 395
  • 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • after noting policy concerns implicit in the right of redemption, the court concluded that right of redemption applied to commercial leáses because statute made no distinction between commercial and residential leases
  • after noting policy concerns implicit in the right of redemption, the court concluded that right of redemption applied to commercial leases because statute made no distinction between commercial and residential leases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Yetka, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.