Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a conflict between a claimant’s testimony and his or her daily activities can support an adverse credibility finding
• holding that ALJ was “responsible for resolving 22 conflicts” and “internal inconsistencies” within doctor’s reports
• holding that the ALJ was “responsible for resolving 11 conflicts” and “internal inconsistencies” within physician’s reports
• holding that ALJ was “responsible for 16 resolving conflicts” and “internal inconsistencies” within doctor’s reports
• holding that ALJ was “responsible for resolving conflicts” and “internal inconsistencies” 20 within doctor’s reports
• holding that ALJ was 17 “responsible for resolving conflicts” and “internal inconsistencies” within doctor’s reports

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).