Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to argue that there was no violation because safety belts are \worn at all times\ and are \normally tied off\ emasculates the regulation; interpreting 29 C.F.R. § 1926.28(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).