5K Logistics, Inc. v. Daily Express, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that only carriers, but not brokers, can seek indemnification under the Amendment
• explaining that Congress narrowly limited the application of apportionment as between carriers, “explicitly choos[ing] not to extend the apportionment remedy to ‘brokers,’” for example
• noting that “Congress explicitly chose not to extend the apportionment remedy to ‘brokers’”
• “The Carmack Amendment clearly preempts any state statutory or common law claim for indemnification”
• “[T]here is no overlap in the statute between ‘carriers’ and ‘brokers’ … .”
• “[T]here is no overlap in the statute between carriers and brokers ... .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).