5812 Invest. Group, L.L.C. v. Columbus
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5930
Syllabus
The trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim based on the affirmative defense of political-subdivision immunity as to plaintiff's claim for trespass, but did not err in denying the motion as to plaintiff's claims for negligence, interference with water rights, and private nuisance. The defendant failed to demonstrate that the complaint obviously or conclusively established the R.C. 2744.02(B)(2) exception to immunity did not apply to plaintiff's claims for negligence, interference with water rights, and private nuisance.
Judges: Jamison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.