Skip to main content
· 12/3/1991

Federal Case

Citations

  • 950 F.2d 377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that individual’s control over own work schedule indicative of independent contractor status
  • finding that while the plaintiff obtained training from her putative employer, because the plaintiff was free to leave the company at any time and use her skills elsewhere, this weighed in favor of finding that the company was not the plaintiff’s employer
  • “[T]he employer’s right to control is the most important when determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor.”
  • affirming worker’s status as independent contractor despite company training

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.