569 East County Boulevard LLC v. Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ is not required to ask VE hypotheticals on limitations that were not credible
• finding that claimant’s ability to “perform[] personal tasks, homework, and errands” discredited her testimony alleging that she is unable to work
• finding that a plaintiff’s ability to “perform[] personal tasks, homework, and errands” ran counter to testimony that she is unable to work
• noting that “[s]ubjective complaints may be discounted if the claimant’s testimony is inconsistent with the evidence as a whole”
• explaining that courts review the record “to ensure that an ALJ does not disregard evidence or ignore potential limitations,” but do not require an ALJ “to mechanically list and reject every possible limitation” (citations omitted)
• stating that an ALJ need not mechanically list every possible limitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).