Skip to main content
· 12/15/1977

530 East 89 Corp. v. Unger

Citations

  • 43 N.Y.2d 776
  • 373 N.E.2d 276
  • 402 N.Y.S.2d 382
  • 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • unless the act of malpractice is within a layman’s competence to evaluate, “[i]t is incumbent upon the plaintiff to present expert testimony to support allegations of malpractice ... ”
  • \It is incumbent upon the plaintiff to present expert testimony to support allegations of malpractice ... except where the alleged act of malpractice falls within the competence of a lay jury to evaluate....\
  • “It is incumbent upon the plaintiff to present expert testimony to support allegations of malpractice ... except where the alleged act of malpractice falls within the competence of a lay jury to evaluate....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Cooke Concur in Memorandum Judge Fuchsberg Taking No Part

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.