528 Baronne Owners Ass'n v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, although there is no federal constitutional right to counsel in state habeas corpus proceedings, there is a state law right to counsel that necessarily encompasses a right to competent counsel
• reasoning that statutory right to habeas counsel \would become an empty shell if it did not embrace the right to have the assistance of a competent counsel\
• reasoning that statutory right to habeas counsel “would become an empty shell if it did not embrace the right to have the assistance of a competent counsel”
• determining that \[t]he right to effective assistance of counsel is predicated on the statutory right to habeas counsel\ and that \[i]t would be absurd to have the right to appointed counsel who is not required to be competent\
• determining that ”[t]he right to effective assistance of counsel is predicated on the statutory right to habeas counsel” and that ”[i]t would be absurd to have the right to appointed counsel who is not required to be competent”
• recognizing right to effective assistance of counsel in habeas proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).