Skip to main content
· 9/13/2006

5220 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, LLC v. Stebbins

Citations

  • 937 So. 2d 1189
  • 2006 WL 2612845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the \2002 amendment to section 163.3215 was intended to simplify the time limit for bringing the de novo action to challenge a development order by requiring that the action be filed within thirty days of rendition of the development order\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gersten, Ramirez, and Wells

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.