Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the statement that a candidate was best qualified as too vague because it “leaves no opportunity for the employee to rebut the given reason as a pretext”
• rejecting the statement that a candidate was best qualified as too vague because it “leaves no opportunity for the employee to rebut the given reason as a pretext”
• “A mere statement that the employer hired the best qualified person leaves no opportunity for the employee to rebut the given reason as a pretext . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).