513 W. 26th Realty LLC v. George Billis Galleries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that suits in federal court by state employees seeking money damages for violations of Title I of ADA are barred by Eleventh Amendment
• holding that \[t]he contrast ... is stark\ between the evidence supporting the VRA's enactment and the insufficient evidence of state discrimination against the disabled
• holding that application of the Americans with Disabilities Act to the States exceeds Congress's power under § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment
• holding that Congress did not validly abrogate the states’ Eleventh Amendment immunity for Title I claims seeking monetary damages
• holding that Title I of the ADA did not validly abrogate the states’ immunity under the Eleventh Amendment
• holding that Congress did not validly abrogate the states’ sovereign immunity from suit by private individuals for money damages under Title I of the ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).