Skip to main content
· 7/14/1999

4805 Convoy, Inc., a California Corporation v. City of San Diego, a Political Subdivision of the State of California

Citations

  • 183 F.3d 1108
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 7159
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5594
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 15707
  • 1999 WL 493273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiff had standing to challenge provisions regarding revocation and suspension of adult entertainment licenses but not the issuance of those licenses
  • holding plaintiff lacked standing to challenge adult cabaret licensing requirement where it already held a license, but had standing to challenge renewal provisions
  • holding plaintiff lacked standing to challenge adult cabaret licensing requirement where it already held a license, but had standing to challenge renewal provisions
  • holding the adult business lacks standing to challenge the license provisions because it “cannot assert that it will ever again be subject to the licensing provisions, because it has never indicated that it intends to pursue another license”
  • Court conducts self-interest analysis as part of \reasonable and necessary\ inquiry, only after concluding that the contract was substantially impaired
  • Court conducts self-interest analysis as part of “reasonable and necessary” inquiry, only after concluding that the contract was substantially impaired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Kozinski, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.