Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding instances of alleged contradictions and inconsistencies were too insubstantial to allow a reasonable jury to infer pretext
• concluding instances of alleged contradictions and inconsistencies were too insubstantial to allow a reasonable jury to infer pretext
• court may not “second-guess business deci sions made by employers, in the absence of some evidence of impermissible motives”
• “Statistics generally are not of significance in age discrimination cases unless the disparities in treatment are quite large.”
• “This court will not second guess business decisions made by employers, in the absence of some evidence of impermissible motives.”
• inference of age discrimination not met where of 18 employees terminated, over 60 per cent under age 40

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).