Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment in favor of employer on race discrimination claim and stating 14 that an employee’s “subjective personal judgments [about experiencing discrimination] do not raise 15 a genuine issue of material fact.”
• plaintiff’s “subjective personal 15 judgments” that she “‘felt’ competent and was ‘confident of [her] skills’” insufficient to meet pretext 16 burden on summary judgment
• “[T]he employee must do more than establish a prima facie case.... ” (citation omitted)
• to 14 meet the burden under the McDonnell Douglas framework, a plaintiff must offer specific and 15 significantly probative evidence that the employer’s alleged purpose is a pretext for 16 discrimination
• “[S]ubjective 6 personal judgments do not raise a genuine issue of material fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).