41 Riv. Rd., LLC v. Bank of Am., NA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that issue of whether statute was designed to create two punishments for the same criminal act is one of statutory interpretation
• noting that issue of whether statute was designed to create two punishments for the same criminal act is one of statutory interpretation
• noting that issue of whether statute was designed to create two punishments for the same criminal act is one of statutory interpretation
• noting that issue of whether statute was designed to create two punishments for the same criminal act is one of statutory interpretation
• noting that, in adding the second paragraph to § 641, “Congress was trying to reach a new group of wrongdoers, not to multiply the offense of the ... robbers themselves.”
• requiring only that the jury be instructed that “a guilty verdict [may] be returned upon either count but not both”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).