41 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1789, 41 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,492 John W. McNeil Cross-Appellant v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \front pay may be less appropriate when liquidated damages are awarded\
• reviewing a district court order denying front pay; McKnight v. Gen. Motors Corp., 908 F.2d 104 (7th Cir. 1990) (reviewing a district court order denying reinstatement); Taylor v. Teletype Corp., 648 F.2d 1129 (8th Cir. 1981) (reviewing a district court order denying reinstatement
• “front pay may be indicated especially when the plaintiff has no reasonable prospect of obtaining comparable employment”
• front pay appropriate where aggrieved party has no reasonable prospect of obtaining work, or where award period is relatively short
• “[A] plaintiff need not request reinstatement as a prerequisite to recovering front pay when reinstatement would be inappropriate.”
• friction between plaintiff and his co-workers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).