407 N 117 Street v. Harper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, by withdrawing its motion to remand, plaintiff had waived its right to request remand based on forum-defendant rule
• holding that a plaintiff consented to district court jurisdiction by failing to move for remand, instead filing an amended petition and agreeing to stipulations
• saying that “[t]he court, whose duty it is to protect the interests of the infant, should see to it that they are not bargained away by those assuming ... to represent him”
• if a..non-removing party has taken action in federal court, such as amending the complaint, that party has essentially acquiesced in the federal court’s jurisdiction
• if a non-removing party has taken action in federal court, such as by amending the complaint, that party has essentially acquiesced in the federal court’s jurisdiction
• if a non-removing party has taken action in federal court, such as by amending the complaint, that party has essentially acquiesced in the federal court’s jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).