Skip to main content
· 12/21/1999

3v, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 83 F. Supp. 2d 1351
  • 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 1047
  • 23 C.I.T. 1047
  • 21 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2256
  • 1999 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing an action for failing to meet the Article III case or controversy requirement because the two putative classification provisions carried the same duty rate
  • finding no case or controversy where the claimed an assessed classifications were duty free
  • granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss because both the assessed and claimed provisions were duty-free

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.