3883 Connecticut LLC v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there are “two essential elements of [a] ‘class of one’ equal protection claim: (1) disparate treatment of similarly situated parties (2) on no rational basis.”
• concluding that the District’s procedures provided adequate due process in part because they provided for “post-deprivation review before two District officials and then immediate appeal to the District Board of Appeals and Review”
• concluding that the District’s procedures provided adequate due process in part because they provided for “post-deprivation review before two District officials and then immediate appeal to the District Board of Appeals and Review”
• holding government may impose regulatory requirements on other parties, so long as it does not do so to “target[] [Plaintiff] without a legitimate reason”
• determining whether D.C. law creates a property interest, protected by the Fifth Amendment, in preliminary building permits
• finding a property interest in the possession of a building permit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).