· 4/26/1990
366-388 Geary Street, L.P. v. Superior Court
Citations
- 219 Cal. App. 3d 1186
- 268 Cal. Rptr. 678
- 1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 407
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that party’s label of appearance as “general” or “special” does not control and that a request for continuance is a form of relief that a party may seek only by submitting to the court’s jurisdiction
- finding trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant preliminary injunction regarding matters in the bankruptcy estate
- finding trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant preliminary injunction regarding matters in the bankruptcy estate
- ‘‘the federal district courts, and the bankruptcy courts to which they refer matters, have exclusive jurisdiction only over ‘cases under title 11,’ i.e., the bank- ruptcy proceeding itself’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.