Skip to main content
· 4/26/1990

366-388 Geary Street, L.P. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 219 Cal. App. 3d 1186
  • 268 Cal. Rptr. 678
  • 1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that party’s label of appearance as “general” or “special” does not control and that a request for continuance is a form of relief that a party may seek only by submitting to the court’s jurisdiction
  • finding trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant preliminary injunction regarding matters in the bankruptcy estate
  • finding trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant preliminary injunction regarding matters in the bankruptcy estate
  • ‘‘the federal district courts, and the bankruptcy courts to which they refer matters, have exclusive jurisdiction only over ‘cases under title 11,’ i.e., the bank- ruptcy proceeding itself’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.