Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pretext cannot be established by mere conclusory statements
• “[Pretext cannot be established by mere ‘conclusory statements’ of a plaintiff who feels he has been discriminated against.”
• \[P]retext cannot be established by mere 'conclusory statements' of a plaintiff who feels he has been discriminated against.\
• “[P]retext cannot be established by mere ‘conclusory statements’ of a plaintiff who feels [s]he has been discriminated against.” (quoting Elliott v. Grp. Med. & Surgical Serv., 714 F.2d 556, 566 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1215, 104 S.Ct. 2658, 81 L.Ed.2d 364 (1984
• “[P]retext cannot be established by mere ‘conclusory statements’ of a plaintiff who feels he has been discriminated against.” (quoting Elliott v. Grp. Med. & Surgical Serv., 714 F.2d 556, 566 (5th Cir. 1983)). 16 See Patrick v. Ridge, 394 F.3d 311, 317 (5th Cir. 2004

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).