3 Stonedeggs, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Board decision dismissing without prejudice a request for revision on the basis of clear and unmistakable is a final decision for purposes of the Court's jurisdiction
• noting that manifestly changed outcome might be “obvious from the context of the pleadings” or “inferred from a sympathetic reading”
• noting that manifestly changed outcome might be \obvious from the context of the pleading\ or \inferred from a sympathetic reading\
• noting that manifestly changed outcome might be \obvious from the context of the pleadings\ or \inferred from a sympathetic reading\
• noting that a request for revision that fails to comply with the pleading requirements \'shall be dismissed without prejudice to refiling'\ (quoting 38 C.F.R. § 20.1404(b))
• noting that in reading a pro se request for CUE sympathetically “the Board should view the claim in light of the fact that it is the assertion of CUE itself that requires specificity,” but “a manifestly changed outcome might be inferred from pro se pleadings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).