3-D Electric Co. v. Barnett Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that specific jurisdiction did not exist even though nonresident defendant sent correspondence to plaintiffs in Texas
• holding that specific jurisdiction did not exist even though nonresident defendant sent correspondence to plaintiffs in Texas
• holding that a close relationship between a parent corporation and a subsidiary may justify finding that the parent “engages in business” in the jurisdiction through the local activities of its subsidiary
• holding that a close relationship between a parent corporation and a subsidiary may justify finding that the parent \engages in business\ in the jurisdiction through the local activities of its subsidiary
• holding that sending payment to Texas was insufficient contact for jurisdiction
• holding that sending payment to Texas was insufficient contact for jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).