Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that less than two months between a protected activity and an adverse employment action supported an employee’s prima facie case of retaliatory discharge
• noting in retaliation case that “where motive, intent and credibility are key factors summary judgment is generally inappropriate.”
• defendant did not deny that he knew of employee’s filing of EEOC claim or that discharge of employee was in retaliation for filing EEOC claim
• defendant did not deny that he knew of employee’s filing of EEOC claim or that discharge of- employee was in retaliation for filing EEOC claim
• “[Wjhere motive, intent and credibility are key factors [in an employment discrimination suit] summary judgment is generally inappropriate”
• retaliatory discharge claim involving section 704(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).