24/7 Records, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that plaintiff waived its right to sue for certain claims when it failed to specifically object in writing to the royalties or expenses pursuant to the parties’ agreement
• precluding lost income-producing asset damages theory disclosed for the first time in joint pretrial order
• rejecting lost profits damages where plaintiff “point[ed] to evidence of past revenue, but fail[ed] to take into account its operating costs”
• precluding lost income-producing asset damages theory disclosed for the first time in joint pretrial order
• precluding plaintiff from proving damages theory when it “failed to make th[e] mandatory initial disclosure,” “thereby depriving defendants of a meaningful opportunity to conduct discovery” about it
• excluding a damages theory that 24/7 Records disclosed for the first time “just weeks before trial in the joint pre-trial order, long after the close of discovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).