Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendant had “consistently been named as one of the fifty largest companies in the ‘Fortune 500’ listing” and that the “impact of granting or denying benefits ... [was] minuscule compared to [defendant’s] bottom line”
• noting that the function of the court utilizing the arbitrary and capricious standard is not to decide whether it would reach the same decision as the plan administrator or even rely on the same authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).