21 Fair empl.prac.cas. 990, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,594 Ina P. Anderson v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that because a preliminary injunction that alters the status quo is\particularly disfavored\ the movant must make a strong showing of entitlement
• mandatory injunction is inappropriate where retroactive promotion and back pay are available if the employee succeeds on the merits
• mandatory injunction is inappropriate where retroactive promotion and back pay are available if the employee succeeds on the merits
• generally, mandatory injunctions require 28 extreme or very serious damage and not issued in doubtful cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).