Skip to main content
· 4/9/1981

1st Lt. Jerome M. Pradier v. Jose Martin Elespuru and Luis Basterrechea D/B/A Basterrechea Distributing Company

Citations

  • 641 F.2d 808
  • 31 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 806
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that a party’s failure to comply with a local court rule requiring placement of a jury demand notation in the caption of 26 pleading did not result in waiver of jury trial
  • holding that, where the body of a pleading contains a jury trial demand, the pleading need not also state in its caption that a jury trial is requested in order to comply with Rule 38(b)—even if a district court rule requires such a statement
  • “The parties are entitled to know at the outset of the trial whether the decision will be made by the judge or the jury.”
  • “Because the right to a jury trial is a fundamental right guaranteed to our citizenry by the Constitution, courts should indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver.”
  • “The parties are entitled to know at the outset of the trial whether the decision will be made by the judge or the jury.”
  • “There are frequently significant tactical differences in presenting a case to a court, as opposed to a jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Reinhardt, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.