Skip to main content
· 11/5/1987

1st Coppell Bank v. Smith

Citations

  • 742 S.W.2d 454
  • 1987 Tex. App. LEXIS 9171
  • 1987 WL 32131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that forgery was established because the witness testified “unequivocally that she did not authorize anyone to sign her name to the deed of trust”
  • concluding that forgery was established because the witness testified “unequivocally that she did not authorize anyone to sign her name to the deed of trust”
  • concluding that forgery was established because the witness testified \unequivocally that she did not authorize anyone to sign her name to the deed of trust\
  • concluding that forgery was established because the witness testified A unequivocally that she did not authorize anyone to sign her name to the deed of trust @
  • concluding testimony of document examiner who used two rather than twelve exemplars was not “so speculative or conjectural as to be without probative value”
  • parties entered into settlement agreement based on mistaken belief that pñor forged deed was valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howell, Stewart, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.