· 11/5/1987
1st Coppell Bank v. Smith
Citations
- 742 S.W.2d 454
- 1987 Tex. App. LEXIS 9171
- 1987 WL 32131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that forgery was established because the witness testified “unequivocally that she did not authorize anyone to sign her name to the deed of trust”
- concluding that forgery was established because the witness testified “unequivocally that she did not authorize anyone to sign her name to the deed of trust”
- concluding that forgery was established because the witness testified \unequivocally that she did not authorize anyone to sign her name to the deed of trust\
- concluding that forgery was established because the witness testified A unequivocally that she did not authorize anyone to sign her name to the deed of trust @
- concluding testimony of document examiner who used two rather than twelve exemplars was not “so speculative or conjectural as to be without probative value”
- parties entered into settlement agreement based on mistaken belief that pñor forged deed was valid
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howell, Stewart, Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.