Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Antitrust standing requires more 12 than the ‘injury in fact’ and the ‘case or controversy’ required by Article III of the Constitution.”
• “[Plaintiff] complains not about higher prices or about injury to competition, but about injury to itself. Thus, [plaintiff] had suffered no antitrust injury.”
• “Antitrust standing requires more than the ‘injury in fact’ and the ‘case or controversy’ required by Article III of the Constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).