Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no prejudicial error when excluded evidence was “at best, cumulative since the record reveals that the plaintiffs presented numerous other pieces of evidence designed to show” defendant’s knowledge
• “Reversal will not be granted unless SIDIBE V. SUTTER HEALTH 91 prejudice is shown.” (simplified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).