1900 Capital Trust III v. Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where, as here, the defendant did not object to a jury instruction at trial, we review for plain error
• explaining that “evidence 5 not referenced in the indictment may be admitted for impeachment or other legitimate 6 purposes, without effecting any changes to the indictment”
• 'Evidence not referenced in the indictment may be admitted for . . . 'other legitimate purposes,' without effecting any changes to the indictment.'
• “It is the province of the trier of fact ‘to determine the credibility of witnesses, resolve evidentiary conflicts, and draw reasonable inferences from proven facts.’” (quoting United States v. Magallon-Jimenez, 219 F.3d 1109, 1114 (9th Cir. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).