19 Fair empl.prac.cas. 177, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8987 Anna Marie Taylor, Cross-Appellant v. Philips Industries, Inc., Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is “[n]ot until the plaintiff establishes what she contends are her damages [that] the burden of going forward to rebut the damage claim or to show plaintiff’s failure to mitigate damages, fall on defendant”
• holding that it is “[n]ot until the plaintiff establishes what she contends are her damages [that] the burden of going forward to rebut the damage claim or to show plaintiff's failure to mitigate damages, fall on defendant”
• allowing comparison to “all” of female’s successors, including non- immediate successors
• \Not until plaintiff establishes what she contends are her damages does the burden of going forward to rebut the damage claim ... fall on the defendant.\
• “Not until plaintiff establishes what she contends are her damages does the burden of going forward to rebut the damage claim . .. fall on the defendant.”
• “Not until the plaintiff establishes what she contends are her damages does the burden of going forward to rebut the damage claim or to show plaintiff’s failure to mitigate damages, fall on defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).