19 Employee Benefits Cas. 2351, Pens. Plan Guide P 23915t Ernest L. Akers v. Valfrid E. Palmer Alco Gravure Industries, Inc., Donald H. McKinnon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ERISA does not require that day-to-day corporate business transactions, which may have a collateral effect on prospective, contingent employee benefits, be performed solely in the interest of plan participants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).