Skip to main content
· 2/5/2009

1836 S STREET TEN. ASS'N, INC. v. Estate of B. Battle

Citations

  • 965 A.2d 832
  • 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 18
  • 2009 WL 256022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “regardless of the parties' actual subjective intentions, the ultimate issue is whether, by their choice of language . . . , they objectively manifested a mutual intent to be bound contractually”
  • describing the interplay between a tenant’s right to receive a bona fide offer of sale and the right of first refusal
  • noting that the statutory directive pertains to “ambiguity in TOPA’s language”
  • if the contract contained all material terms, \the bargain is enforceable even if the parties never reach agreement on the non-material terms.\
  • “[A]n offer is, by definition, binding on the offeror if it is properly accepted by the offeree.”
  • “[a] valid ‘offer’ must contain all of the material terms of the bargain, and if such an offer is accepted, the bargain is enforceable even if the parties never reach agreement on the non-material terms”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruiz, Glickman, Schwelb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.