176 East 123rd Street Corp. v. Frangen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While [the plaintiff] may perceive the result as ‘unfair,’ it is well established that we ‘may not sit as super personnel departments, assessing the merits--or even the rationality--of employers’ nondiscriminatory business decisions’”
• “[Law 44] was modeled after the ADA. It was intended to harmonize Puerto Rico law with the federal statutory provisions of the ADA. Thus, the elements of proof for a claim under Law 44 are essentially the same as for a claim under the ADA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).