1616 Reminc Ltd. Partnership v. United States Elevator Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “reconsideration of a previous order is an extraordinary remedy to be employed sparingly in the interests of finality and conservation of scarce judicial resources”
• noting that “reconsideration of a previous order is an extraordinary remedy to be employed sparingly in the interests of finality and conservation of scarce judicial resources”
• “[A motion to alter or amend judgment] is not a vehicle for rehashing arguments already rejected by the court or for refuting the court's prior decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).