1611 Euclid Avenue, Inc. v. Ritter, Ritter & Zaretsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that expert testimony ‘‘amounted to an improper legal opinion on the ultimate issue in the case’’
• agreeing that expert testimony ‘‘amounted to an improper legal opinion on the ultimate issue in the case’’
• expert testimony that certain conduct consti- tuted breach of fiduciary duty was improper legal opinion on ultimate issue
• \nature and extent of an agent's authority is a question of fact for the trier where the evidence is conflicting or where there are several reasonable inferences which can be drawn\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “nature and extent of an agent’s authority is a question of fact for the trier where the evidence is conflicting or where there are several reasonable inferences which can be drawn” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• claims not briefed on appeal are deemed to be abandoned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).